Realty Times of June 1, 2009
An excellent guide on keeping your house payment in an affordable range!
Helping Clients Estimate Their Affordability Range by Ralph Roberts
Traditionally, real estate and mortgage professionals have encouraged homeowners to stretch – to shop for homes at the upper end of their affordability range. We wanted them to maximize their investment, and we were seeing property values and incomes rise, especially for homeowners who were first starting out. It all made for a very sound investment in housing.
Recently, I have begun to question what an "affordable house payment" means. Even some of the major players in the mortgage lending industry have different ideas of what "affordable" means:
U.S. Treasury: 31 percent front-end DTI (debt-to-income) ratio, and less than 55 percent back-end DTI
FHA (Federal Housing Administration) Old: 29 percent front-end DTI, and 41 percent back-end DTI
FHA New: 31 percent front-end DTI, and 43 percent back-end DTI
Fannie Mae: 36 percent benchmark back-end DTI with a maximum of 45 percent with "strong compensating factors"
Conventional loans: 28 percent front-end ratio, and a 36 percent back-end ratio My rule of thumb is a maximum 30 percent front-end DTI. This means that a homeowner's monthly house payment or PITIA (principal, interest, taxes, insurance, and association fees) should be no higher than 30 percent of the gross monthly household income. For every $1,000 per month in household income, the homeowner should be able to afford $300 of house payment.
The trouble with these guidelines, even my guideline, is that they fail to take into account other mitigating factors. For example, couple with four children paying their own medical insurance premiums is probably going to be able to afford less house than a young couple with no children whose employers provide health insurance.
Likewise, a family that spends $400 per month to heat their home will have less money available for a house payment. Let's look at a specific example. Suppose a family of four is pulling in about $6,000 per month. That's $72,000 annually. To simplify, we'll assume the family is debt free, except for the new home they are about to purchase. Based on a front-end DTI of 31 percent, the couple should be able to afford a monthly house payment of $1,860. That leaves them with $4,140 per month to cover everything else.
According to Ginnie Mae's How Much Home Can You Afford? calculator, an annual gross household income of $72,000 can afford a monthly house payment of $2,235. This represents a 37 percent front-end DTI, which is outside most guidelines.
Before we encourage the couple to purchase a $200,000 plus house, let's take a look at their current monthly budget. Assuming we were to sell them a house and saddle them with a $1,860 monthly mortgage payment, here's where the rest of the money ($4,140) would be going each month:
Income taxes (28 percent) $1,160
Daughter's college $1,000
Electricity (avg.) $250
Husband's health insurance $160
Groceries $400
Auto insurance $180
Auto fuel $100
Auto license $28
Auto maintenance/repairs $200
Charitable contributions $100
Movies, TV, Internet $120
Medical/dental (un-reimbursed) $250
Clothing & shoes $80
Dining out $100
Gifts $50
Personal care $40
Pets $40
Total $4,258.00
Now, you wouldn't exactly characterize this family as living large, yet if it had a house payment of $1,860, it would be seriously struggling every month to make ends meet.
What we as real estate professionals can learn from this example is that home financing eligibility guidelines are just that – guidelines, ballpark figures to get the conversation going. Mortgage lenders, real estate agents, and other professionals who are providing guidance to homeowners on how much house they can afford do their clients a grave disservice by using these general guidelines to make recommendations to specific families about how much house they can afford.
Currently, we are doing this all backwards. We tell homeowners how much house they can afford and then expect them to make the tough budget decisions to make that payment affordable. When the family still can't afford their house payment, we assume they are overspending and send them to credit counseling to become further humiliated.
Perhaps a better way to qualify homeowners for mortgage loans is to start with the family's existing budget and projections and develop a realistically affordable house payment based on current and projected net income and monthly expenses. Remember, every family's situation is unique. We need to tailor their house payment to their budget, not the other way around.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Tax credit ineligible for down payment
Feds reverse rule to assist first-time home buyers
by J. Craig Anderson - May. 19, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic
Federal officials on Monday reversed an earlier decision to allow first-time home buyers to use an $8,000 tax credit to borrow the down payment on a home.
A week earlier, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan had told the National Association of Home Builders that HUD would let banks and local governments offer short-term "bridge loans" to cover the down payment for first-time buyers eligible for the tax credit. The loans would have been available to applicants for federally insured mortgages such as Federal Housing Administration loans.
Lenders, home builders and real- estate agents had reacted favorably to the bridge-loan proposal, saying it would open up the housing market to more first-time buyers.
However, not everyone was in favor of using the tax credit as collateral on a down-payment loan.
"That tax credit should be savings, not debt," said Patricia Garcia-Duarte, executive director of Neighborhood Housing Services in Phoenix.
Garcia-Duarte said the proposal too closely resembled a now-illegal practice known as seller-funded down-payment assistance, which allowed a home's seller to "gift" the down payment to a specific buyer through a non-profit organization.
Phoenix loan originator Dean Wegner was among the housing-industry professionals who had expressed enthusiasm about the bridge-loan plan.
Wegner said the program would have boosted local home sales, but he added that the bridge loans likely would have come with a high interest rate.
The loans also could have created income-tax issues, according to the IRS officials who shot down HUD's plan.
Still, Wegner remains optimistic that the government will seek other means to circumvent the FHA's required 3.5 percent down payment.
"They will probably come out with a zero-down FHA loan starting January 1, once the $8,000 goes away," he said.
by J. Craig Anderson - May. 19, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic
Federal officials on Monday reversed an earlier decision to allow first-time home buyers to use an $8,000 tax credit to borrow the down payment on a home.
A week earlier, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan had told the National Association of Home Builders that HUD would let banks and local governments offer short-term "bridge loans" to cover the down payment for first-time buyers eligible for the tax credit. The loans would have been available to applicants for federally insured mortgages such as Federal Housing Administration loans.
Lenders, home builders and real- estate agents had reacted favorably to the bridge-loan proposal, saying it would open up the housing market to more first-time buyers.
However, not everyone was in favor of using the tax credit as collateral on a down-payment loan.
"That tax credit should be savings, not debt," said Patricia Garcia-Duarte, executive director of Neighborhood Housing Services in Phoenix.
Garcia-Duarte said the proposal too closely resembled a now-illegal practice known as seller-funded down-payment assistance, which allowed a home's seller to "gift" the down payment to a specific buyer through a non-profit organization.
Phoenix loan originator Dean Wegner was among the housing-industry professionals who had expressed enthusiasm about the bridge-loan plan.
Wegner said the program would have boosted local home sales, but he added that the bridge loans likely would have come with a high interest rate.
The loans also could have created income-tax issues, according to the IRS officials who shot down HUD's plan.
Still, Wegner remains optimistic that the government will seek other means to circumvent the FHA's required 3.5 percent down payment.
"They will probably come out with a zero-down FHA loan starting January 1, once the $8,000 goes away," he said.
Monday, May 11, 2009
The New Appraisal System
From Realty Times of May 11, 2009
Washington Report: Appraisal System
by Kenneth R. Harney
Last week saw the official kickoff of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's mandatory new system of appraisals nationwide, and some mortgage and appraisal groups are up in arms over sharply higher costs for consumers.
The so-called "home valuation code of conduct" imposed by Fannie and Freddie puts most appraisal assignments in the hands of management companies, some of whom are owned by major lenders such as Bank of America and Wells Fargo.
The Appraisal Institute, which represents 20,000 appraisers across the country, and the National Association of Realtors, which has thousands of appraiser members, both have been critical of the new code.
The Institute is particularly incensed at the expanded management company role in appraisals because those companies pay appraisers much less than their standard fees, and tack on thirty to fifty percent extra charged to the consumer.
For example, an appraiser who'd normally charge $325 for a valuation ordered though a lender or mortgage broker, now might be required by a management company to do the same work for $175 to $200.
Meanwhile the consumer, who has no idea where the money is going, is charged $400 or more for the appraisal, and must pay for it up front by credit card, rather than at closing.
The $200 to $225 extra goes to the management company. If the deal falls through and the mortgage doesn't close, that's the consumer's problem. The appraisal fee has already been pocketed by the management company.
Now evidence is circulating in Washington that not only are appraisal fees significantly higher under the new Fannie-Freddie code, but are being extended to FHA mortgages, despite the fact that FHA is not covered by the code.
The National Association of Mortgage Brokers has begun documenting the higher fees and other problems with the new code. In one case the association shared with Realty Times last week, a large lender, EverBank, circulated its list of new appraisal fees to be charged consumers through its "automated appraisal system."
Not only does the bank require credit payment for appraisals up front, but it now charges a flat $465 for FHA appraisals and $390 for standard single family conventional appraisals. Flat fees go up to $700 in Hawaii.
Roy de Loach, CEO of the brokers group, cited one member's experience -- where total appraisal fees for a routine FHA cash-out refi ballooned to $1,068 to the consumer.
Home buyers and realty professionals need to be aware of these sharply escalating fees -- and their controversial use on FHA loans that are supposed to be exempt from the Fannie-Freddie code.
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Washington Report: Appraisal System
by Kenneth R. Harney
Last week saw the official kickoff of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's mandatory new system of appraisals nationwide, and some mortgage and appraisal groups are up in arms over sharply higher costs for consumers.
The so-called "home valuation code of conduct" imposed by Fannie and Freddie puts most appraisal assignments in the hands of management companies, some of whom are owned by major lenders such as Bank of America and Wells Fargo.
The Appraisal Institute, which represents 20,000 appraisers across the country, and the National Association of Realtors, which has thousands of appraiser members, both have been critical of the new code.
The Institute is particularly incensed at the expanded management company role in appraisals because those companies pay appraisers much less than their standard fees, and tack on thirty to fifty percent extra charged to the consumer.
For example, an appraiser who'd normally charge $325 for a valuation ordered though a lender or mortgage broker, now might be required by a management company to do the same work for $175 to $200.
Meanwhile the consumer, who has no idea where the money is going, is charged $400 or more for the appraisal, and must pay for it up front by credit card, rather than at closing.
The $200 to $225 extra goes to the management company. If the deal falls through and the mortgage doesn't close, that's the consumer's problem. The appraisal fee has already been pocketed by the management company.
Now evidence is circulating in Washington that not only are appraisal fees significantly higher under the new Fannie-Freddie code, but are being extended to FHA mortgages, despite the fact that FHA is not covered by the code.
The National Association of Mortgage Brokers has begun documenting the higher fees and other problems with the new code. In one case the association shared with Realty Times last week, a large lender, EverBank, circulated its list of new appraisal fees to be charged consumers through its "automated appraisal system."
Not only does the bank require credit payment for appraisals up front, but it now charges a flat $465 for FHA appraisals and $390 for standard single family conventional appraisals. Flat fees go up to $700 in Hawaii.
Roy de Loach, CEO of the brokers group, cited one member's experience -- where total appraisal fees for a routine FHA cash-out refi ballooned to $1,068 to the consumer.
Home buyers and realty professionals need to be aware of these sharply escalating fees -- and their controversial use on FHA loans that are supposed to be exempt from the Fannie-Freddie code.
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Phoenix in the middle of recovery
Realty Times of May 8, 2009
Hot Market: Phoenix in the middle of recovery by M. Anthony Carr
A year ago, I covered the Phoenix market in this column, saying that comparing April '08 to April '07, it looked like this western market had hit bottom – sales were up 15 percent year-over-year. That prediction, seems to have been right on the nose as nearly 12 months later, sales are up a whopping 78 percent from March 2008 to March 2009.
With listings down 17 percent for the metro area, sales are siphoning off inventory and buyers are picking deals at prices they haven't seen in more than 5 years, according to blogger Ron Wilczek, West USA Realty "Another notable fact is that the year over year (YOY) sales are up for the 10th consecutive month," blogs Wilczek. "One more notable fact: the year over year over year (YOYOY) sales are up for the fourth consecutive month. I admit that I "made up" that last statistical category. But essentially it means that the sales in March 2009, February 2009, January 2009 and December 2008 were all higher than the same months for the last two years."
The foreclosure sale dominates the market, but may be a necessary evil to jump-start one of the largest markets in the southwest. Wilczek says foreclosure sales make up more than 75 percent for March 2009.
"Though March's percentage was a slight increase from February 2009's, the percentage of Phoenix foreclosure sales (Valley wide) has remained relatively stable over the last three months," he says. "This is a change from the trend we saw starting in June 2007 and lasting until December 2008. Foreclosure properties during that time sold at a steadily increasing rate each month -- sometimes by a substantial amount."
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Hot Market: Phoenix in the middle of recovery by M. Anthony Carr
A year ago, I covered the Phoenix market in this column, saying that comparing April '08 to April '07, it looked like this western market had hit bottom – sales were up 15 percent year-over-year. That prediction, seems to have been right on the nose as nearly 12 months later, sales are up a whopping 78 percent from March 2008 to March 2009.
With listings down 17 percent for the metro area, sales are siphoning off inventory and buyers are picking deals at prices they haven't seen in more than 5 years, according to blogger Ron Wilczek, West USA Realty "Another notable fact is that the year over year (YOY) sales are up for the 10th consecutive month," blogs Wilczek. "One more notable fact: the year over year over year (YOYOY) sales are up for the fourth consecutive month. I admit that I "made up" that last statistical category. But essentially it means that the sales in March 2009, February 2009, January 2009 and December 2008 were all higher than the same months for the last two years."
The foreclosure sale dominates the market, but may be a necessary evil to jump-start one of the largest markets in the southwest. Wilczek says foreclosure sales make up more than 75 percent for March 2009.
"Though March's percentage was a slight increase from February 2009's, the percentage of Phoenix foreclosure sales (Valley wide) has remained relatively stable over the last three months," he says. "This is a change from the trend we saw starting in June 2007 and lasting until December 2008. Foreclosure properties during that time sold at a steadily increasing rate each month -- sometimes by a substantial amount."
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Friday, April 10, 2009
$8,000 tax credit
From Realty Times of April 10, 2009
Market Conditions
by Realty Times Staff
Most have heard about the $8,000 tax credit for first time homebuyers. Here are a few tips to see if you are eligible and how to go about claiming it.
According to the National Association of Home Builders, you must have purchased a home from January 1 to December 1 of this year. To be considered a first time homebuyer, however, you only need to have not owned a home in the last three years. This is great news for those who have bought before, but have been out of the homeownership game for a while. The buyer must also "have a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) less than $95,000 for single tax payers or $170,000 for married filers."
To claim the credit, buyers complete IRS Form 5405 to calculate the amount of the tax credit, and enter it on line 69 of the IRS 1040 income tax return. And you can only make a claim once the purchase of the home is complete.
More information on the first-time home buyer tax credit can be found at www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Market Conditions
by Realty Times Staff
Most have heard about the $8,000 tax credit for first time homebuyers. Here are a few tips to see if you are eligible and how to go about claiming it.
According to the National Association of Home Builders, you must have purchased a home from January 1 to December 1 of this year. To be considered a first time homebuyer, however, you only need to have not owned a home in the last three years. This is great news for those who have bought before, but have been out of the homeownership game for a while. The buyer must also "have a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) less than $95,000 for single tax payers or $170,000 for married filers."
To claim the credit, buyers complete IRS Form 5405 to calculate the amount of the tax credit, and enter it on line 69 of the IRS 1040 income tax return. And you can only make a claim once the purchase of the home is complete.
More information on the first-time home buyer tax credit can be found at www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Mortgage Rates Remain under 5 Percent
From Realty Times of April 10, 2009
Application for Purchase and for Refinancing up Nicely as Mortgage Rates Remain under 5 Percent
McLEAN, VA -- Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS) in which the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 4.87 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending April 9, 2009, up from last week when it averaged 4.78 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 5.88 percent.
The 15-year FRM this week averaged 4.54 percent with an average 0.7 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.52 percent. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 5.42 percent.
Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 4.93 percent this week, with an average 0.7 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.92 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 5.56 percent. .
One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 4.83 percent this week with an average 0.5 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.75 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.18 percent. The 1-year ARM has not been lower since the week ending September 29, 2005, when it averaged 4.68 percent.
"Mortgage rates rose slightly this week but still remained historically low," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist. "Interest rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages have averaged below 5.0 percent for the last four weeks, which should keep homeowner affordability at record levels.
"Given these low rates, housing demand has strengthened. Conventional mortgage applications both for refinancing and for home purchases have increased over the past five consecutive weeks ending April 3. Since the end of February, applications for home purchases were up about 22 percent and nearly 129 percent for refinancing, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Application for Purchase and for Refinancing up Nicely as Mortgage Rates Remain under 5 Percent
McLEAN, VA -- Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey (PMMS) in which the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 4.87 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending April 9, 2009, up from last week when it averaged 4.78 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 5.88 percent.
The 15-year FRM this week averaged 4.54 percent with an average 0.7 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.52 percent. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 5.42 percent.
Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 4.93 percent this week, with an average 0.7 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.92 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 5.56 percent. .
One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 4.83 percent this week with an average 0.5 point, up from last week when it averaged 4.75 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.18 percent. The 1-year ARM has not been lower since the week ending September 29, 2005, when it averaged 4.68 percent.
"Mortgage rates rose slightly this week but still remained historically low," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist. "Interest rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages have averaged below 5.0 percent for the last four weeks, which should keep homeowner affordability at record levels.
"Given these low rates, housing demand has strengthened. Conventional mortgage applications both for refinancing and for home purchases have increased over the past five consecutive weeks ending April 3. Since the end of February, applications for home purchases were up about 22 percent and nearly 129 percent for refinancing, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Housing Most Affordable
Realty Times of April 10, 2009
Housing Most Affordable: May be Time to Move from Renting to Owning
by Phoebe Chongchua
Falling housing prices, historically low interest rates, and tax credits are creating an enticing environment for renters to convert to homeowners.
"We are still going to have a tremendous amount of foreclosures, price declines, and best opportunities to buy properties at amazing prices," says Bruce Norris of The Norris Group.
If that sounds like a mixed bag of bad and good, indeed it is. Consumers have been inundated with news about a troubled real estate market. "If you look at the closings for California, 55 percent or more closings every month are lender-owned properties; that ratio has never existed before. So, the lenders are really dictating the prices at this point and there are so many lender-owned properties that the appraiser almost has no choice but to give that comp a lot of credence," says Norris. But the good news, especially for those who have been wanting to take the plunge into homeownership is that markets across the country are ripe for choosing the most suitable home.
"The affordability has never been this high. So, in relationship to income, California is the cheapest it's ever been. The fact that prices will still go down kind of means nothing to the person who is going to live in a house for quite a long time -- partly because the interest rates are also historically low," says Norris.
He points to his own daughter as an example. She is getting married this year and buying her own house for the first time.
"I think it's a very bright decision. Do I think her neighborhood might go down for another year-and-a-half, yeah—and to that I say, who cares! She's tying up an interest rate that's probably under 5 percent for 30 years and that may be the real bargain," says Norris.
Her fiancé owns a home but Norris and the couple agreed that her buying a home now is a good opportunity. So after the couple marries they will live in the home in order to receive maximum financial benefits. His daughter is using an FHA loan and putting $4,000 down on a $110,000 California home that was, at the height of the real estate boom worth, $330,000. She will then get a federal tax credit for $8,000 and she can receive that money (in as few as 10 days) now rather than waiting until she files her 2009 tax return. Best of all, the mortgage payment is less than it would cost to rent.
This is a trend that is playing out in many areas across the country. "Fortunately, the interest rates are national so you have that incredible interest rate that is forcing the mortgage payment below rent in many locations, including California. So the area that my daughter is buying in, her rent would be $1,100 and her mortgage payment is going to be about $825," says Norris.
Norris says that, coupled with the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, is making renters weigh their options, "It really is an inducement for people to go from being a renter to an owner."
"There are lots of areas that didn't go up as much as California. Let's pick an area, Texas, for instance, you have houses selling for $110,000 to $120,000 range and the rents there are also pretty high--$1,100 - $1,200 or so—so payments there are also a lot less if they own it," says Norris.
"It's most affordable right now, so you would think that everybody would want in, but real estate right now has a lot of fear attached to it and a lot of uncertainty about jobs," says Norris.
Some markets such as California are working to help alleviate barriers to home ownership. The California Association of Realtors in April introduced the Housing Affordability Fund's Mortgage Protection Program. There are specific eligibility requirements; talk to your Realtor for details.
"People who buy property in 2009 have a safety blanket now of six months of up to $1,500 payments per month that the California Association of Realtors, out of some fund that it has, will pay the people's payments," says Norris. He adds, "I've never heard anything like it."
Norris says while these programs to entice renters to become buyers are attractive, he says make sure you're ready to buy. He says there are specific habits that you should have in place before buying a home.
"You should already have developed a savings habit and you're ready to buy a home because you have a little bit of money left over in case something goes wrong," says Norris.
Another affirming reason to move from renting to buying comes from statistics from John Burns Real Estate Consulting in Irvine, California.
The company reports that 50 percent of the 76 metropolitan area markets across the U.S. that are tracked show that people can buy a house (after tax cost of homeownership considered) for less than they could rent one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Housing Most Affordable: May be Time to Move from Renting to Owning
by Phoebe Chongchua
Falling housing prices, historically low interest rates, and tax credits are creating an enticing environment for renters to convert to homeowners.
"We are still going to have a tremendous amount of foreclosures, price declines, and best opportunities to buy properties at amazing prices," says Bruce Norris of The Norris Group.
If that sounds like a mixed bag of bad and good, indeed it is. Consumers have been inundated with news about a troubled real estate market. "If you look at the closings for California, 55 percent or more closings every month are lender-owned properties; that ratio has never existed before. So, the lenders are really dictating the prices at this point and there are so many lender-owned properties that the appraiser almost has no choice but to give that comp a lot of credence," says Norris. But the good news, especially for those who have been wanting to take the plunge into homeownership is that markets across the country are ripe for choosing the most suitable home.
"The affordability has never been this high. So, in relationship to income, California is the cheapest it's ever been. The fact that prices will still go down kind of means nothing to the person who is going to live in a house for quite a long time -- partly because the interest rates are also historically low," says Norris.
He points to his own daughter as an example. She is getting married this year and buying her own house for the first time.
"I think it's a very bright decision. Do I think her neighborhood might go down for another year-and-a-half, yeah—and to that I say, who cares! She's tying up an interest rate that's probably under 5 percent for 30 years and that may be the real bargain," says Norris.
Her fiancé owns a home but Norris and the couple agreed that her buying a home now is a good opportunity. So after the couple marries they will live in the home in order to receive maximum financial benefits. His daughter is using an FHA loan and putting $4,000 down on a $110,000 California home that was, at the height of the real estate boom worth, $330,000. She will then get a federal tax credit for $8,000 and she can receive that money (in as few as 10 days) now rather than waiting until she files her 2009 tax return. Best of all, the mortgage payment is less than it would cost to rent.
This is a trend that is playing out in many areas across the country. "Fortunately, the interest rates are national so you have that incredible interest rate that is forcing the mortgage payment below rent in many locations, including California. So the area that my daughter is buying in, her rent would be $1,100 and her mortgage payment is going to be about $825," says Norris.
Norris says that, coupled with the federal tax credit for first-time homebuyers, is making renters weigh their options, "It really is an inducement for people to go from being a renter to an owner."
"There are lots of areas that didn't go up as much as California. Let's pick an area, Texas, for instance, you have houses selling for $110,000 to $120,000 range and the rents there are also pretty high--$1,100 - $1,200 or so—so payments there are also a lot less if they own it," says Norris.
"It's most affordable right now, so you would think that everybody would want in, but real estate right now has a lot of fear attached to it and a lot of uncertainty about jobs," says Norris.
Some markets such as California are working to help alleviate barriers to home ownership. The California Association of Realtors in April introduced the Housing Affordability Fund's Mortgage Protection Program. There are specific eligibility requirements; talk to your Realtor for details.
"People who buy property in 2009 have a safety blanket now of six months of up to $1,500 payments per month that the California Association of Realtors, out of some fund that it has, will pay the people's payments," says Norris. He adds, "I've never heard anything like it."
Norris says while these programs to entice renters to become buyers are attractive, he says make sure you're ready to buy. He says there are specific habits that you should have in place before buying a home.
"You should already have developed a savings habit and you're ready to buy a home because you have a little bit of money left over in case something goes wrong," says Norris.
Another affirming reason to move from renting to buying comes from statistics from John Burns Real Estate Consulting in Irvine, California.
The company reports that 50 percent of the 76 metropolitan area markets across the U.S. that are tracked show that people can buy a house (after tax cost of homeownership considered) for less than they could rent one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2009 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
